Analysis of Determinants for Suture-mediated Closure Device Failure During EVAR Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for elective and emergency infrarenal aortic pathologies is the primary approach for treatment nowadays. During such procedure, the suture-mediated closure device (SMCD) (Perclose ProGlideTM, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA) is commonly used. This study aimed to identify potential contributors for SMCD failure in a patient cohort of elective and emergency EVAR. METHODS: Archived medical records from patients who underwent EVAR for aortic pathologies in elective and emergency setting at the University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany were included. Patient's co-morbidities, access vessel morphologies and hemostasis-related blood parameters were evaluated on their association with SMCD failure applying different statistical methods. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients (139 femoral accesses) was included. The mean age was 73.5 ± 8.4 years. Overall SMCD failure rate was 4.3%, 4.1% for elective and 5.9% for emergency cases, respectively. Total procedure time was longer for the SMCD failure group (323 ± 117.8 min vs 171 ± 43.7 min). The calcification status of the common femoral artery (CFA), the diameter of the aortic bifurcation, and dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) on the medication plan prior to the procedure were associated with SMCD failure. Univariate binary logistic regression analysis nominated several potentially relevant predictors for SMCD failure who underwent subsequent multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. Here, DAPT on the medication plan was identified as being promising in predicting SMCD failure (OR 30.5), while anterior plaque formation in the CFA maintained as only statistically relevant determinant (OR 44.9). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the CFA calcification status to be associated with SMCD failure. Although discontinued prior to endovascular treatment, DAPT was also found to be associated with SMCD failure. Our results may advocate to perform obligatory platelet testing prior to EVAR to maximize patient safety.

[Vascular injuries during urologic surgery]. / Gefäßverletzungen während urologischer Operationen.

This review article summarizes the epidemiology of vascular injuries during urologic surgery and discusses intraoperative strategies to control bleedings. Techniques of vascular approaches (arteries and veins) are discussed and tricks for vascular repair are explained. Generally, vascular injuries during urologic surgery are rare. However, hemorrhage due to vascular injury is a common cause of critical morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. Susceptibility to vascular complications such as oncological debulking and revision surgery increase risk for damage. As vascular injuries range from arrosion to avulsion, treatment is also broad, ranging from vascular suture to open or endovascular repair. Prevention of exsanguination requires visual control to stop the bleeding. The surgeon must act quickly to initiate appropriate repair, aiming for damage control and stabilization of the patient. Planning the surgery and consulting an experienced surgeon are decisive for successful management. Catastrophic bleeding has to be controlled and in the case of arterial injury it is often necessary to reconstitute perfusion. Reconstructions such as vascular anastomoses, patch angioplasty or interposition grafts are the preferred surgical techniques which are influenced by the nature of the injury. Vessels have to be thoroughly prepared before cross clamping to prevent injury by vascular clamps. Veins can often be ligated. Endovascular repair is also a possibility to control the bleeding, but nowadays it is often a definitive therapy method. For example, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion is useful to stabilize the patient and then to initiate vascular repair. Depending on the type of surgery performed, different vessels are concerned. Severe bleeding is usually located retroperitoneal affecting the aorta, renovisceral and iliac vessels. Predisposing urologic operations are lymphadenectomy, nephrectomy and (cysto)prostatectomy and also the laparoscopic approach can cause bleeding complications.